Contents of Section

Chapter:

227 PDFTitle:MAGISTRATES ORDINANCEGazette Number:
Section:23Heading:Variance between information and evidenceVersion Date:30/06/1997

(1) In every case of an information for any offence punishable on summary conviction any variance between the information and the evidence adduced in support thereof as to the time at which the offence or act is alleged to have been committed shall not be deemed material, if it is proved that such information was in fact laid within the time limited by law for laying the same; and any variance between the information and the evidence adduced in support thereof as to the place in which the offence or act is alleged to have been committed shall not be deemed material, provided that the offence or act is proved to have been committed within the jurisdiction of the magistrate by whom the information is heard and determined.
(2) If any such variance, or any variance in any other respect between the information and the evidence adduced in support thereof, appears to the magistrate to be such that the defendant has been thereby deceived or misled the magistrate may-

        (a) adjourn the hearing of the case and if he is satisfied that the variance is due to default or neglect on the part of the complainant, informant or his counsel, as the case may be, he may order that the complainant or informant shall pay to the defendant such costs, not exceeding $5000, as the magistrate may think fit; and (Amended 18 of 1981 s. 3)
        (b) commit the defendant to prison or some place of security or to such other custody as the magistrate may think fit, or admit him to bail, with or without surety or sureties. (See Forms 5-9) (Replaced 36 of 1976 s. 8)
(3) Where a defendant admitted to bail under subsection (2)(b) does not appear at the time and place appointed for the adjourned hearing, a magistrate may declare any recognizance to be forfeited and issue a warrant for the arrest of the defendant. (See Form 3) (Added 36 of 1976 s. 8)
[cf. 1848 c. 43 s. 9 U.K.]