Cap 296A reg 4A Application of regulations 3 and 4 to air transhipment cargo (RESERVED COMMODITIES (CONTROL OF IMPORTS, EXPORTS AND RESERVE STOCKS) REGULATIONS; RESERVED COMMODITIES ORDINANCE)

Contents of Section

Chapter:	296A	Title:	RESERVED COMMODITIES (CONTROL OF IMPORTS, EXPORTS AND RESERVE STOCKS) REGULATIONS	Gazette Number:	29 of 2000
Regulation:	4A	Heading:	Application of regulations 3 and 4 to air transhipment cargo	Version Date:	26/05/2000

(1) Regulation 3(1) does not apply in relation to a reserved commodity that is air transhipment cargo; but if at any time between its being brought into and taken out of Hong Kong such reserved commodity is removed from the cargo transhipment area of Hong Kong International Airport then, for the purposes of regulation 3(1)-

(a) the reserved commodity is deemed to be imported at the time of such removal; and

(b) the person who brought the reserved commodity, or caused it to be brought, into Hong Kong as air transhipment cargo is deemed to be the person who imports the reserved commodity at the time of its removal,

and, except to that extent, that regulation has effect as if this paragraph had not been enacted.
(2) Regulation 4(1) does not apply in relation to a reserved commodity that is air transhipment cargo; but if at any time between its being brought into and taken out of Hong Kong such reserved commodity is removed from the cargo transhipment area of Hong Kong International Airport, regulation 4(1) has effect as if this paragraph had not been enacted.

(3) (a) For the purpose of the issue of a licence under regulation 11 for the import of a reserved commodity, the import of a reserved commodity that is air transhipment cargo does not take place unless and until the reserved commodity is removed from the cargo transhipment area of Hong Kong International Airport other than for the purpose of its being taken out of Hong Kong by air.

(b) Nothing in this regulation precludes the issue of a licence under regulation 11 for the export of a reserved commodity that is air transhipment cargo only because the reserved commodity has been removed from the cargo transhipment area of Hong Kong International Airport.

(4) In proceedings against a person for an offence under regulation 25(2)(a) for a contravention of regulation 3(1) or 4(1), being proceedings-

(a) in relation to the import or export of a reserved commodity that is air transhipment cargo; and

(b) in which it is necessary for the prosecution to prove that, at any time between its being brought into and taken out of Hong Kong, the reserved commodity was removed from the cargo transhipment area of Hong Kong International Airport,

it is a defence for the person to show that he took all reasonable steps and exercised reasonable diligence to avoid such removal occurring or that he reasonably believed that such removal had not occurred, as the case may be.
(5) Where in any proceedings the defence provided by paragraph (4) involves an allegation that the commission of the offence was due to-

(a) the act or default of another person; or

(b) reliance on information given by another person,

the defendant is not, without the leave of the court, entitled to rely on the defence unless, not less than 10 days before the hearing of the proceedings, he has served a notice in writing on the prosecutor giving all particulars of-

(i) the person who committed the act or default or gave the information; and

(ii) the act, default or information,

of which he is aware at the time he serves the notice.
(6) A person is not entitled to rely on the defence provided by paragraph (4) by reason of his reliance on information supplied by another person, unless he shows that it was reasonable in all the circumstances for him to have relied on the information, having regard in particular to-

(a) the steps which he took, and those which might reasonably have been taken, for the purpose of verifying the information; and

(b) whether he had any reason to disbelieve the information.

(29 of 2000 s. 8)